Straight From His Mouth: Is The Time He Takes To Reply An and they tend to take a long time to respond, I think the same thing. I was dating a woman for a few weeks and we'd been on maybe three or four dates. By now, I think we've all tried online dating at some point or know people who have. Time and time again, friends of mine feel crushed when they build a their profile, respond to things they message you (assuming they've. The term 'dating value' may seem a little calculating, but it's How we 'rate' someone can dictate how long it takes us to reply (Image: Getty).
If someone wants to see you again, especially in the heady first dates period, they will be waiting for your text and checking to make sure they haven't missed one. If they don't reply they're not that interested so move on - forget the people who are too busy and hold out for someone who is excited to see your name flash up, thinking "Yess! If someone I was interested in were to text me then I'd reply pretty much asap - not in a needy way, but in a "why play games?
If I want to see them, and they ask to meet, I reply and agree. No "wait a day or you'll seem desperate" BS.
YMMV posted by billiebee at I would definitely follow up to confirm that they received the text. I've seen people advise that it's okay even to send a 3rd text, but nobody ever says okay to send a fourth. I would be more concerned that either my text did not reach them, or theirs did not reach me, or something along those lines than anything else. I had this happen to me once and wondered what was going on, and found out much later that the woman in question had tried to send a voicemail and it did not go through.
I wish I'd tried once more. I would not worry about whether you're bothering them.
If it's really bothering them and they're interested, they will take this as a sign that they need to communicate better, and if it's bothering them and they're not interested, they will let you know rather than continue with the pocket veto.
If B doesn't respond to a post-date text within a day or two, A ought to go the old-fashioned route and DIAL the number to follow up with a real phone call. Then A says something along the lines of, "Hey! Had a nice time the other day. Just wanted to follow up on my text from Tuesday and suggest we get together again soon. Give me a call, and in the meantime have a great day.
A texted, A called. If B doesn't respond in a timely manner post date in any way whatsoever, B is an inconsiderate jerk—or dead. It's not the first time I've seen texts go missing or be delayed, but this is by far the most extreme example. Anyway, the lesson here is what DarlingBri points out: My "rules" are basically meant to minimize my anxiety because I'm the kind of person that can take a half hour to write a one sentence text if I'm crushing hard on someone.
To that end, I text them once, remind them once a few days later, and then assume they weren't interested in dating if they don't respond. Even though I am not much of a text person and even though I often do not even have my phone on me on a non-work day. The idea that some have proposed here that if someone doesn't respond to one text they aren't interested is, to use the technical term, bat-shit-insane. As you pointed out, OP, someone may not have even received your text, they may have received it and thought they responded but didn't.
Or they may, like me, literally have no idea where their phone even is because they aren't tied to it like much of the world seems to expect these days. As for how you deal with not receiving a response to your text, you could go about it in a variety of ways. You could try another method of communication, like email or voice I am much more of an email person, and would respond to that quicker.
You could send one follow-up text, perhaps adding a piece of information so you don't feel like you are bugging them for example, "hey, that movie I invited you to, it might be better to go to the 7: Whatever else you do, please don't punish someone for not sharing your personal beliefs about how and when messages should be responded to, unless you are in a relationship with someone and have explicitly agreed that A person will respond to B's texts within X amount of time.
And investing emotionally early on by freaking out over texts is not very good for you emotionally. If someone doesn't respond, and you have 1 nice date and you're already super hyper invested and sending follow up messages, I'd get scared off by that. Seriously, there's a slight chance some weird might have happened, but if he hasn't returned your text, it's far far far too early to be chasing after this one person for a second date.
Go make plans with other guys, date around before you get so hopeful and hung up on one person that you're anxious about them texting.
I'm a ghoster, when I'm not particularly interested in the person I've gone out with. I'm pleasant, I tend to have a good time, and sometimes the guy is very interested and I'm just not but I'm going to be nice and still put in effort to be friendly and nice. Lots of ppl think it's wrong to ghost, but I think ghosting is kind, especially if it's just been 1 date. I definitely prefer ghosting and being ghosted on.
Sometimes I can't articulate why I don't like someone. Sometimes I don't want to confess that their hairstyle reminds me of Larry's from Three's Company or they give me a bad vibe.
If I don't text back or call back or decide to just block them for not getting the hint from my ignoring their messages, it's not my job to spell it out for them.
And it's better for them too, because I'd just end up feeling sorry for not liking them and struggle with possibly making some guy angry or even maybe violent by hurting their ego. So go on more dates. If this guy's interested, trust me, he'll let you know. He may be interested in a person he went out with or met after your date and is preoccupied. Other ppl are different but if I wasn't responding to a communication attempt, I'd want that person to respect my space and not demand explanations or put me in the position of having to explain myself when I'm trying to focus or do something else.
So just go on dates with other guys, assume he can't be bothered right now for whatever reason, and maybe he'll catch up with you later. Or maybe he won't. After one or two dates, you shouldn't get so focused on one person, or maybe take the time to assess what's driving this need to hear from him.
I have definitely not received texts before or gotten them days after they were sent. So, I think it's entirely feasible that your crush either didn't get the text or thought a response was already sent.
One low-key follow up after a reasonable time period day or two? I think texting in general is bad for early dating, but totally understand why you would do it, and it's definitely an easy communication method.
It's also really, really easy to miscommunicate with people you don't know well while texting. I tend to miss a lot of texts because I don't really get my phone so well.
I'd do it after about a week. But my best friend and I routinely ignore text messages from each other for days, so YMMV - I'm not very text-oriented despite being Just one other thing: While everyone has their own rules, seeing as you're both adults you can try them a second time if you like and add something like "If you want me to buzz off I hear you If I weren't interested in someone I'd have told them so shortly after they first texted me about another date, and I wouldn't like the implication that I was doing the immature fade-out thing.
So for me, a follow-up text like this one would get a polite "Eh In other words, be casual with your one follow-up text.
It IS you - why the longer it takes someone to reply to a text, the less they like you
For me, it might say something like - "Hi - any interest in getting that drink? It's absolutely okay to say -- especially if you've already established text-based communication -- "I really prefer same-day responses to texts. You can also feel free to call me, if that's easier.
If someone fancies you, the chances are they will get back to you quickly". The rapidity with which people do reply is more of a modern phenomenon however, as Dr Blumberg explains. We're always 'on' and no longer live in age of delayed gratification.
Then there's all that lovely text analysis Image: Getty "What we do is we subconsciously rate people on metrics like attractiveness, wealth, personality, status, style, IQ, emotional intelligence, kindness and empathy, perceived attitudinal similarities and perceived social liabilities.
Then you compare that score to the score you've given yourself. The same applies if they subconsciously believe their score is higher than yours. There are some factors, however, which mean this rule is not an absolute. Read More Virgin, 29, who's expecting her first baby plans to remain sex-free after birth How we 'rate' someone can dictate how long it takes us to reply Image: Getty A person may have low self-esteem, or overly-inflated self-esteem, meaning there'll be a disparity between their score and the score others would give them.
On this matter Dr Blumberg is clear. Should we revert to letters? Getty "Yes, they could be on holiday, or they could be playing games, which are the best outcomes.
People don't tend to sit on the fence about game-playing.